🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are observing closely to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a growing chorus of states are considering comparable bans.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader arguing that smartphones and apps are "stealing our kids' childhood". Legislation is expected to be formalized soon.
• Norway is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to verify the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has called on parliament to pass a proposal lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has suggested a comparable action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended families to block their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a symbolic statement calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 without a parent decides otherwise is given. Even though it warns of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the step does not establish binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a good foundation," said the European lawmaker supporting the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "supported by conclusive research".

Earlier, support grew behind a legislative effort to introduce restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the government vowed to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a teenager who was lost after viewing disturbing social media material contends that a simple age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could create a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the tech sector to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and suitable for minors," commented a prominent peer.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

Stateside, regulation is primarily occurring at the local level due to country-wide gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has signed a bill barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has passed a regulation restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra time requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced measures mandating parental consent for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from certain individuals to follow this path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from Europe and the US, further countries are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, global bodies strike a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

Even as this international debate continues, the steps of this nation and several other countries show that governments internationally are less and less prepared to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.